This Tuesday INSIDER Daily Digest starts off with a look at a massive environmental review of the proposed missile defense site on Guam, the Defense Department issues a roadmap for its new industrial base strategy, an industry group has questions on how CMMC requirements will move through the systems, and congressional members want the White House budget office to examine the Navy’s submarine funding plan.
The Pentagon has released a very big environmental review of the future Guam missile defense project:
DOD identifies key elements of Guam Defense System, proposes 16 sites, 1,000 operators
The Defense Department has, for the first time, outlined major components of a planned 360-degree air and missile defense system for Guam in a legally required report intended to inform the public -- specifically the island’s residents and their elected leaders -- about the environmental impacts of the system.
The Defense Department is spelling out how its new industrial base strategy will be paid for:
DOD releases defense industrial strategy implementation plan to guide spending
The Defense Department has released an implementation plan for its first-ever National Defense Industrial Strategy detailing planned investments in Army munitions, Navy submarines, and other key areas.
A leading industry group has questions about CMMC requirements:
NDIA questions Defense Dept. flow down of CMMC requirements from prime to subcontractors under final program rule
The National Defense Industrial Association is raising concerns over how prime contractors will determine the maturity level needed for subcontracts and work through flow down requirements under the Pentagon’s final rule to establish the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program.
Several lawmakers are asking for a thorough review of the Navy’s submarine spending plans:
Lawmakers urge OMB to ‘carefully assess’ submarine funding proposal, whack Navy over lack of transparency
A bipartisan group of senators has issued a cautious endorsement of an as-of-yet undetailed Navy proposal aiming to combat submarine delays and cost overruns by restructuring how the vessels are paid for, urging the Pentagon to closely examine the plan while requesting greater transparency from the Navy.