The Insider

By John Liang
March 28, 2014 at 8:00 PM

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is praising the next head of NATO.

In a statement released today, Hagel said:

I welcome the selection of Norway's former Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg to be NATO's next secretary general. He will succeed current Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Oct. 1, 2014. Former Prime Minister Stoltenberg will bring strong credentials and experience to the alliance at a critically important time. NATO has been and continues to be a force for peace, prosperity, and freedom not only in Europe, but around the world, and the United States will continue to strongly support the alliance, and all of its member nations. America's commitment to NATO's collective defense is firm and resolute.

I want to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to NATO Secretary General Rasmussen for his many years of strong leadership, for his commitment to strengthening the alliance, and for his continued hard work in bringing a critical NATO summit together this coming September in Wales.

By John Liang
March 27, 2014 at 9:24 PM

A group of 20 retired Marine Corps generals is highlighting concerns about the Defense Department's current 30-year shipbuilding plan.

In a March 25 letter to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) and Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-OK), the generals write:

The challenges of diminished ship material readiness and the declining numbers of amphibious warships are interrelated and have cumulative effect on the nation's ability to support strategic imperatives. To address this we recommend that the Congress provide supplemental Overseas Contingency Operations funding to provide improved material readiness and reset for today's surface warships and funding for the proven LPD-17 design in the future LX(R) construction.

By John Liang
March 26, 2014 at 4:37 PM

The Senate Armed Services Committee this morning voted to approve the nomination of Robert Work to become the next deputy defense secretary, according to a panel statement.

The committee also approved the nominations of Air Force Gen. Paul Selva to be head of U.S. Transportation Command and Navy Vice Adm. Michael Rogers become the next director of the National Security Agency and head of U.S. Cyber Command.

Additionally, the committee approved the nominations of:

* Michael McCord to be Pentagon comptroller;

* Christine Wormuth to be under secretary of defense for policy;

* David Shear to be assistant secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs; and

* Eric Rosenbach to be assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense.

The nominations will now go to the full Senate for consideration.

By Gabe Starosta
March 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM

The Pentagon yesterday announced the details behind its ninth Joint Strike Fighter low-rate initial production lot, which will include heavy international participation.

The $698 million contract award to Lockheed Martin will fund long-lead parts, materials and components for 57 aircraft, of which 34 are intended for the U.S. military. The Air Force will buy 26 F-35A conventional-variant jets, the Marines will buy six short-takeoff F-35Bs, and the Navy -- which slowed its acquisition ramp-up this year -- wants just two carrier-capable F-35Cs.

The remaining 23 aircraft are to be split between a number of Joint Strike Fighter partner nations and foreign military sales customers. On the FMS side, Israel and Japan will fund the procurement of their first F-35s, with Israel buying seven in LRIP 9 and Japan purchasing two. Among the countries that contributed to the F-35's development costs, Norway will receive six A-model jets; Italy is buying one F-35A and one F-35B; and the United Kingdom will procure six B-model short-takeoff platforms.

Those aircraft will be manufactured at Lockheed's Fort Worth, TX, production facility. The contract announcement says work should be done in May 2015, though that likely covers only long-lead work.

Regardless, the international investment in LRIP 9 is good news for DOD, and especially the Air Force and Marine Corps. As order quantities increase, the price of each aircraft built decreases, so the two services -- by far the biggest JSF buyers so far -- stand to enjoy a slight discount.

JSF contracting is run through Naval Air Systems Command.

By James Drew
March 20, 2014 at 8:56 PM

The Air Force is exploring options for a follow-on to the MQ-9 Reaper even as the service scales back procurement of the remotely piloted aircraft and looks to fully retire its predecessor, the MQ-1 Predator.

According to service spokeswoman Maj. Mary Danner-Jones, Air Combat Command recently established an ISR Futures Office to begin the formal process of defining the requirements of a follow-on RPA for medium-altitude intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions.

"The formal process for defining . . . requirements is in the initial stages of development and will be shaped by our national- and defense-strategy goals," she said in a March 19 email.

A top contender for the position is the General Atomics Predator C, known as the Avenger. The service procured its first Avenger as test platform in 2009 and that unit is still in operation today.

By John Liang
March 19, 2014 at 8:49 PM

The Senate Armed Services Committee just released its mark-up schedule for the fiscal year 2015 defense authorization bill.

The subcommittees will hammer out their portions of the bill per the following time line:

Tuesday, May 20, 2014:

9:30 a.m. ----- Subcommittee on Airland. OPEN. Room SD-G50.

11:00 a.m. ----- Subcommittee on Seapower. CLOSED. Room SR-222.

2:00 p.m. ----- Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. CLOSED. Room SR-222.

3:30 p.m. ----- Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support. OPEN. Room SD-G50.

5:00 p.m. ----- Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities. OPEN. Room SD-G50.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014:

10:00 a.m. ----- Subcommittee on Personnel. OPEN. Room SD-G50.

The full committee will then mark up the bill in closed session from the afternoon of May 21 through May 23 if necessary.

By John Liang
March 19, 2014 at 2:44 PM

The Pentagon's Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will hold a joint meeting early next month with the State Department's International Security Advisory Board, according to a notice published in this morning's Federal Register.

The two panels will "share information about their efforts in areas of shared responsibility," the notice states. Acting Deputy Defense Secretary Christine Fox, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Rose Gottemoeller, and Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall will provide opening remarks.

After that, the joint session's agenda is as follows:

Following the opening remarks, the members will receive two classified briefings on the ISAB's work with U.S.-Russia relations and International Cyber Stability. The CIA and DIA will provide a classified briefing on U.S.-Russia relations during the lunch session. At the afternoon session, the members will receive two classified briefings on the TRAC's work with Nuclear Strategic Stability and the Future of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. The meeting will wrap up with a final discussion on the briefings of the day. The Committees will not deliberate nor develop advice and recommendations for either the Department of State or the Department of Defense. The TRAC members only will continue to meet on April 3, 2014. The TRAC will hold classified discussions to deliberate on their review of DoD's Global Combating WMD Awareness System (GCAS) program. The GCAS program is structured to support DoD in its roles to identify, reduce, and mitigate the threat of WMD development, proliferation, and use worldwide. The Committee will provide an assessment on the program's ability to meet that goal. This will be followed by classified deliberations on the future of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (CTR). The Committee was asked to provide recommendations for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Policy) regarding the development of a strategy for articulating the DoD CTR story, how best to coordinate with Combatant Commands on the use of the CTR program, and a strategy to advocate for the program with key stakeholders. The session will conclude with a classified discussion on the way ahead.

By Thomas Duffy
March 18, 2014 at 7:37 PM

The Defense Department today announced that Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold will assume command of Air Force Special Operations Command at Hurlburt Field, FL. Heithold is currently serving as the vice commander of U.S. Special Operations Command.

Heithold joined the Air Force in 1974 and earned his commission in 1981. He is the former commander of the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency. He replaces Lt. Gen. Eric Fiel who has had command of AFSOC since June 2011.

By John Liang
March 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM

Risk management is one of the areas that plays a key role in cybersecurity, according to a Defense Department instruction issued Friday:

(1) DoD will implement a multi-tiered cybersecurity risk management process to protect U.S. interests, DoD operational capabilities, and DoD individuals, organizations, and assets from the DoD Information Enterprise level, through the DoD Component level, down to the IS level as described in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-39 (Reference (o)) and Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Policy (CNSSP) 22 (Reference (p)).

(2) Risks associated with vulnerabilities inherent in IT, global sourcing and distribution, and adversary threats to DoD use of cyberspace must be considered in DoD employment of capabilities to achieve objectives in military, intelligence, and business operations.

(3) All DoD IT will be assigned to, and governed by, a DoD Component cybersecurity program that manages risk commensurate with the importance of supported missions and the value of potentially affected information or assets.

(4) Risk management will be addressed as early as possible in the acquisition of IT and in an integrated manner across the IT life cycle.

By John Liang
March 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM

In the face of a tighter defense budget and plans for a smaller, more expeditionary force by 2025, the Army recently outlined a new way of approaching the modernization of its increasingly complex network. As Inside the Army reports today:

The Tactical Network Roadmap, presented March 13 during an industry day at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, pointed to two new initiatives intended to push out new communication innovations on slimmer budgets: the Simplified Tactical Army Reliable Network (STARNet), set to launch in fiscal year 2016; and the Network After Next (NaN) effort, intended for FY-20 and beyond.

Created by the program executive office command, control, communications-tactical (PEO C3T), STARNet is intended to support the mid-term needs of the network by collaborating with industry to find capabilities and technologies that will feed into the Network Integration Evaluation. NaN is more of an internal partnership with the Army's Communications Electronics Research & Development Engineering Center (CERDEC), and is intended to address long-term network goals.

"We absolutely must change; we can not go down the path we are going right now," Brig. Gen. Daniel Hughes told attendees during the APG industry day. "We've got to get to the point where the network works, it is omnipresent, [and] soldiers do not need to understand the parameters of each and every radio to communicate across those networks."

Document: Army's Tactical Network Roadmap Presentation

By John Liang
March 14, 2014 at 10:38 PM

The Missile Defense Agency today issued a request for information on its new midcourse tracking radar.

The Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) "will provide persistent sensor coverage and improve discrimination capabilities against threats to the homeland from the Pacific theater," according to MDA's fiscal year 2015 budget justification book issued earlier this week. "This new radar also will give the Sea-Based X-band (SBX) radar more geographic deployment flexibility for contingency and test use."

MDA is asking Congress for $79.5 million to begin developing the radar.

As for where the new radar would be based, the RFI states:

The first deployment of the LRDR will be operational in Alaska no later than 2020 with the intent to address threats to the homeland from the Pacific region. The Respondents may assume Clear Air Force Station as a point of reference; however a final location has not been determined and will not be designated until a siting study and environmental analysis is completed.

MDA Director Vice Adm. James Syring said during a March 4 briefing that "we've talked about Alaska, but we're going . . . to do the due diligence and evaluate all the possible alternatives in the Pacific."

By John Liang
March 13, 2014 at 7:07 PM

House Armed Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee Chairman Randy Forbes (R-VA) and three other lawmakers sent a letter today to National Security Adviser Susan Rice calling for an "Asia-Pacific Strategy Review."

In the letter, the lawmakers write:

[W]e want to reiterate that our continued push for an Asia-Pacific Strategy Review is not meant as a way to oppose the Administration's efforts in the region. To the contrary, we desperately wish to see our nation succeed, for our own prosperity and security in addition to that of our allies. A comprehensive, multi-year strategy, in classified and unclassified form, is critical to marshaling the resources for these endeavors and provide effective oversight of their implementation.

By John Liang
March 12, 2014 at 10:58 PM

Navy Vice Adm. Michael Rogers, nominated to become the next head of U.S. Cyber Command, was asked by the Senate Armed Services Committee what he saw as the biggest challenge that will confront CYBERCOM's commander. Here's his answer, submitted in advance of his nomination hearing this week:

I believe the major challenge that will confront the next Commander, U.S. Cyber Command will be dealing with the changing threat in cyberspace. Adversaries today seek persistent presences on military, government, and private networks for purposes such as exploitation and potentially disruption. We as a military and a nation are not well positioned to deal with such threats. These intruders have to be located, blocked, and extracted, sometimes over long periods of time. We have seen the extent of the resources required to wage such campaigns, the planning and intelligence that are essential to their success, and the degree of collaboration and synchronization required across the government and industry (and with our allies and international partners). We in DoD are creating capabilities that can adapt to these uses and others, but we have some key capability gaps in dealing with increasingly capable threats. Our legacy information architecture, for instance, is not optimized for defense in its current form, and our communications systems are vulnerable. U.S. military forces currently lack the training and the readiness to confront advanced threats in cyberspace. Finally, our commanders do not always know when they are accepting risk from cyber vulnerabilities, and cannot gain reliable situational awareness, neither globally nor in US military systems.

By Courtney Albon
March 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel today announced nominees to head Air Force Space Command and Air Mobility Command.

Lt. Gen. John Hyten, who is currently the vice commander of AFSPC, has been nominated to lead that command, succeeding Gen. William Shelton. Shelton has not formally announced plans to retire.

Lt. Gen. Darren McDew, commander of the 18th Air Force, was nominated to serve as commander of Air Mobility Command. AMC's current commander, Gen. Paul Selva, testified this morning in front of the Senate Armed Service's Committee in his own nomination hearing to serve as head of U.S. Transportation Command.

By Gabe Starosta
March 11, 2014 at 3:20 PM

The fiscal year 2015 budget justification documents that describe the Air Force's funding request in a detailed way were released this morning, providing much more information than has been previously available about all of its investment programs.

One program worth highlighting, and one of the Air Force's highest priorities, is the KC-46 aerial refueling tanker. The documents show not just development for the tanker, but procurement as well, and the service expects to spend close to $15 billion between FY-15 and FY-19 buying the aircraft.

As described in the budget documents, the Air Force plans to purchase 69 tankers over the next five years. The number varies from a low of seven in FY-15, to a high of 18 in FY-17 and then remaining relatively steady. The justification pages state that the service will buy 175 production tankers, which, coupled with four test aircraft, bring the KC-46 up to its program of record of 179.

The tanker's unit cost -- a figure sure to be cited for years -- is pegged at between $164 million and $190 million over the next five years, depending on quantities bought and other factors. Over the life of the program, the Air Force expects to pay $175 million per copy for the KC-46.

Boeing, the prime contractor, is due to deliver the first production aircraft in April of calendar year 2016. That means there may not be any overlap at all between developmental test and production, as developmental testing is scheduled to conclude in the second quarter of FY-16. Operational test will be held throughout FY-16 and FY-17, during which time the Air Force will accept a number of production tankers.

The documents also lay out the Air Force's procurement contracting and milestone strategy for the KC-46: The service and Boeing will go through two lots of low-rate initial production using fixed-price contracts before moving into a planned 11 years of full-rate production. That relatively conservative acquisition profile contrasts dramatically with a program on the other extreme, the F-35, which is still concurrently developing and producing aircraft and will run through more than 10 lots of low-rate production, some of them on cost-plus contracts rather than fixed-price agreements.