A new Government Accountability Office report is questioning the Defense Department's method of justifying multiyear procurement contracts -- and whether some already awarded were appropriate or cost-effective. "DOD's process for justifying multiyear programs leaves questions about the appropriateness of some approved MYPs and the cost-effectiveness of investments made for the risks assumed, as indicated by recent submissions for the F-22A and V-22," the report, released Feb. 8, states. "Although the law has clear requirements for stable, low-risk programs with realistic...