The Insider

By John Liang
November 7, 2012 at 3:39 PM

Inside U.S. Trade today published an analysis of the effect of President Obama's re-election on a variety of international trade issues, among them export controls and their effect on the U.S. Munitions List and Commerce Control List. An excerpt:

On export controls, the major question now facing Obama in his second term is how aggressive a stance he will take when it comes to pushing forward his reform initiative. The administration put the political aspects of the initiative on hold in the months leading up the election, partly because pushing ahead could have had adverse ramifications in Congress or provided fodder for criticism on the campaign trail.

Obama must decide whether to start the implementation process by notifying Congress that the administration is moving items in the categories of aircraft and aircraft engines from the U.S. Munitions List (USML) to the less stringent Commerce Control List (CCL), or whether to continue to seek an accommodation with Congress on the extent of the details that need to be included in those notifications.

Under the Arms Export Control Act, a formal notification of moving an item from the USML to the CCL triggers a 30-day layover in which both chambers must pass a joint resolution of disapproval if they want to voice opposition to the proposed change. But one observer said that a successful political strategy for proceeding with notification depends on reaching an accommodation with Congress.

Congressional critics have already moved to alter the notification requirements for the export control reform initiative, which would move a very large number of items off the USML. For instance, the House has already approved a specific provision in its version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would require the administration to enumerate all of the items that it wants to transfer, to the extent possible.

This is a direct reaction to the administration’s favored approach of notifying the items to be removed with fewer details in large, "catch-all" categories. The Senate is expected to take up its version of the NDAA in a lame-duck session of Congress, and it is unclear to what extent it will approve the same provisions on notification that the House put forward. Administration officials have criticized the House language as undermining their ability to make far reaching reforms.

It is unclear if the Obama administration will initiate the notification of USML changes in the lame-duck session, which in the House starts on Nov. 13. Some private-sector sources said they expect the notification process may be delayed until next year.

The administration may also choose to wait until the next Congress comes into power because the leadership of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which has jurisdiction over export control policy, will be completely different.

Current Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), a vocal critic of the administration's reform plan, will relinquish her position under Republican House rules limiting a committee leadership position to six years. Ranking Member Howard Berman (D-CA) is also leaving Congress after losing his race against Democratic rival and fellow committee member Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA).

As a result of these changes, the administration may hold off until the views of the new committee leadership on the notification process become more clear. Foreign Affairs is the primary committee of jurisdiction for export controls in the House, and the administration must notify the committee of any transfers. . . .

Some believe that the effort has already lost some steam due to personnel changes; while Defense Department officials have said that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta supports the initiative as strongly as his predecessor, Robert Gates, there seems to be little public evidence of that.

Similarly, the departure of Ellen Tauscher, who served as the State Department's undersecretary for arms control and international security, for health reasons has slowed progress on export control reform issues. Sources said that Tauscher had the export control knowledge and the political stature to advance export control reform issues within State and that the same combination does not exist in either her successor, Acting Undersecretary Rose Gottemoeller, or in Assistant Secretary for Political and Military Affairs Andrew Shapiro and his deputy, Beth McCormick.

Some sources said the delay in the reform process that was put in place in the months leading up the election occurred despite the fact that the two regulations needed to proceed to notification have been completed in terms of the technical work. One is a regulation that would put forward a definition of what constitutes an item "specially designed" for military applications, and the other governs the transition of items from the USML to the CCL.

According to one private-sector source, the administration has made it clear that the latest version of the "specially designed" rule has been significantly reworked from a revised proposed rule. If that is accurate, it would likely require another round of public comments, which would further delay congressional notification.

By John Liang
November 7, 2012 at 8:18 AM

Boeing today announced a number of reassignments for executives within its Defense, Space and Security business unit, according to a company statement:

* Nan Bouchard will be vice president/general manager (VP/GM) of the C-17 program and Southern California consolidation. She is now VP of the BDS Program Management function.

* Leanne Caret will be VP/GM of a consolidated Vertical Lift division within the BDS Boeing Military Aircraft (BMA) business unit, managing the AH-64 Apache as well as the H-47 Chinook and V-22 Osprey programs. Caret is now vice president of H-47 within BMA's Mobility division.

* Jean Chamberlin will be VP/GM of the BDS Program Management function. She currently oversees the Mobility division, which today includes the C-17, KC-46 Tanker, H-47 and V-22.

* Shelley Lavender will be VP/GM, Integrated Logistics, within the BDS Global Services & Support business unit. She will oversee a broad performance-based logistics portfolio as well as Boeing Defence Australia and Boeing Defence UK. Lavender currently is VP/GM of Global Strike for BMA.

* Ralph Meoni will be VP/GM of a new Electronic & Information Solutions division within the BDS Network & Space Systems business unit. That consolidates his current Electronic & Mission Systems division with the Information Solutions division.

* Tim Peters will be VP/GM of a new consolidated Mobility, Surveillance & Engagement division of BMA. That will include the C-17, KC-46, P-8 and Airborne Early Warning & Control programs. He now is VP/GM for BMA's Surveillance and Engagement division.

* Debbie Rub will be VP/GM of BMA's Global Strike division, managing the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler programs, along with the F-15 and missile programs she currently manages.

* Rub also currently oversees unmanned systems programs. Given the importance of these, their management will continue reporting to BMA President Chris Chadwick. However, to maximize affordability, their functional support will be shared with other BMA organizations.

By John Liang
November 6, 2012 at 9:02 PM

The National Guard Association of the United States is touting the use of a pair of aircraft in hurricane relief efforts in New York that the Pentagon says it doesn't need in the future.

In a statement released this afternoon, NGAUS said a Florida Army National Guard C-23 Sherpa had delivered emergency supplies from the mid-Atlantic to New York and New Jersey, while Maryland, Mississippi and Ohio Air National Guard C-27J Spartan aircraft had flown personnel and equipment to New York:

The C-23 and C-27J are small fixed-wing cargo planes capable of landing on runways that may prohibit other military aircraft. The C-23 has been in the Guard for more than 20 years; the C-27J for two years. Both also have seen duty overseas, where they have been praised for their flexibility, reliability and cost-efficiency.

Yet both are on the Pentagon chopping block.

The Army is scheduled this month to take both of the Florida Army Guard’s C-23s and two aircraft from the Texas Army Guard. And the Air Force planned to divest the C-27J in its fiscal 2013 budget request.

Congress thought it put those plans on hold in the continuing resolution that currently funds the federal government through the end of March, but the Army is moving forward with its plans.

"This is a case where the Pentagon simply doesn't like small cargo aircraft, even if they demonstrate their value to the nation every time out," said retired Maj. Gen. Gus L. Hargett Jr., the president of the National Guard Association of the United States.

"The Army and the Air Force say these planes are unneeded, but there are thousands of ground troops who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan who would disagree, and now, so would tens of thousands of people in New Jersey and New York," he added. "But the Pentagon remains determined."

The Army's determination has caught the attention of the governors of Florida and Texas and some lawmakers.

Gov. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, wrote President Barack Obama on Oct. 11 asking him to intervene.

In Congress, Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., is asking colleagues to sign a letter to Army Secretary John McHugh requesting his "commitment to ensure that the C-23 fleet remains operational until a viable alternative is identified."

Hunter, a member of the House Armed Services Committee and co-chair of the House National Guard and Reserve Components Caucus, is asking that the letter be signed and delivered to McHugh this week.

For some more background, check out this May 21 Inside the Army story.

By John Liang
November 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM

The Air Force is gauging contractor interest in an industry day for companies outside the United Launch Alliance who might want to submit launch-service proposals, according to a Federal Register notice issued this morning:

The Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force (Space), as the Compliance Officer under the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Decision and Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Consent Order"), in the Matter of Lockheed Martin Corporation, the Boeing Company, and United Launch Alliance (ULA), L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as the "Respondents"), Docket No. C-4188, dated May 1, 2007, is posting this announcement to publicize the Consent Order, and determine level of interest for a ULA Consent Order Industry Day.

The Consent Order: The Consent Order requires that with regard to covered Government programs, (1) ULA afford all space vehicle manufacturers non-discriminatory treatment for launch services that ULA may provide, and that (2) Lockheed Martin and Boeing, as space vehicle manufacturers, consider all qualified launch service providers on a non-discriminatory basis. The Consent Order also requires firewalls to prevent information from a space vehicle provider being shared by ULA with its Boeing or Lockheed Martin parent company. Similarly, Boeing and Lockheed Martin must have firewalls to ensure that other launch service information is not shared with ULA. The Consent Order also requires that the Department of Defense appoint a Compliance Officer to oversee compliance with the Consent Order by all three Respondents. The current Compliance Officer is the Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force (Space), Mr. Richard McKinney. The FTC Consent Order states that the Compliance Officer "shall oversee compliance by the Respondents with the terms of this Order, and shall have the power and authority to oversee such compliance."

Industry Day Interest: The purpose of the proposed ULA Industry Day is to inform industry of the Consent Order and its requirements, the ULA, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin compliance with the Consent Order, and the role of the Compliance Officer to oversee the Respondents' compliance with the Consent Order. During the proposed Industry Day, each of the Respondents plans to present information on its specific compliance with the Consent Order requirements. Separate discussion sessions will be available to attendees, at their discretion and request, to meet with the Compliance Officer and his Government team in private to address any questions or comments relating to the Consent Order.

DATES: If sufficient interest exists, the ULA Industry Day will be held the first quarter of 2013.

The meeting location has not yet been determined, the notice states.

View InsideDefense.com's recent coverage of space news.

By John Liang
November 5, 2012 at 4:15 PM

The Congressional Research Service recently issued a report on the F-22 Raptor program. According to the Oct. 25 report:

Ongoing issues for Congress regarding the F-22 program include questions regarding the F-22's supply of oxygen to its pilots, the possible resumption of production, the reliability and maintainability of in-service Raptors, the F-22 modernization program, and the potential sale of F-22s to other countries.

Congress's decisions on all these issues could affect Department of Defense (DOD) capabilities and funding requirements, the U.S. tactical aircraft industrial base, and U.S. relations with other countries.

View the full report.

Check out InsideDefense.com's recent coverage of the F-22 below:

NASA Urges USAF To Reject 'Normalization Of Deviance' On F-22 Raptor
(Inside the Air Force - 09/14/2012)

Air Force Believes Problematic Valve At Heart Of F-22 Oxygen Problems
(DefenseAlert - 07/31/2012)

Panetta Lifts Some Restrictions On Air Force's F-22 Fleet
(DefenseAlert - 07/24/2012)

Senate Presses Air Force On F-22A Sustainment, Cost Tracking Plans
(Inside the Air Force - 06/08/2012)

Appropriators Recommend $50 Million For F-22 Backup Oxygen System
(Inside the Air Force - 05/18/2012)

Air Force General Says F-22 Raptor Pilots Will Not Face Penalties
(Inside the Air Force - 05/11/2012)

View InsideDefense.com's complete coverage of military aircraft issues.

By John Liang
November 2, 2012 at 10:08 PM

The Senate Armed Services Committee today announced it would hold a hearing on Nov. 15 to consider President Obama's nomination of Marine Corps Gen. John Allen to become head of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.

The committee that day will also consider the nomination of Assistant Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford to succeed Allen as the next head of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, according to the statement.

By John Liang
November 2, 2012 at 3:33 PM

An advisory committee to the Commerce Department related to sensors and instrumentation plans to hold a "partially closed" meeting next week, according to a notice published in this morning's Federal Register:

The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC) will meet on November 8, 2012, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public and include remarks from Commerce Department Industry and Security Bureau officials as well as industry presentations, with a closed session to follow, according to the notice.

Inside the Pentagon reports this week that Commerce has completed a night-vision industrial base review to inform the White House's export-control reform efforts amid calls from industry to permit more foreign sales of U.S. night-vision systems:

The "critical technology assessment," dated October, examines night-vision focal plane arrays (FPAs), sensors and cameras. Such reviews assess the impact of export controls on key existing or emerging technologies that are subject to the Commerce Department's export administration regulations.

The study -- based on a survey of 45 night-vision component and equipment manufacturers, divisions and sellers -- aims to determine the nature of night-vision sensor parts and imaging gear manufactured for military-use-only and dual-use (for both commercial and military use). The effort is intended to inform the Obama administration's push to create a single export control list. There are now two primary control lists, one overseen by the Commerce Department and another tied to International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

About 38 percent of survey respondents sold some military-use-only night-vision parts and gear to the Defense Department, the report states. The largest number of companies sold military-use-only cooled infrared cameras to DOD.

Roughly 36 percent of survey respondents sold DOD some dual-use night-vision parts and gear. The largest number of companies sold dual-use image intensification tube (IIT) imagers to DOD.

And about 27 percent of survey respondents received some DOD research and development funding for recent night-vision products.

The number of companies selling night-vision components and gear to the Pentagon, coupled with the low levels of military-use-only exports, shows that most end-users are "not predominately or exclusively military," the report states. A former defense official said this finding reflects the widespread availability of low-level night-vision systems. The night-vision industry sees the ITAR as too vague and restrictive, the source said, noting there is an understanding that the most-capable systems should remain restricted but industry wants to be able to export more mid-level technology akin to what foreign defense contractors already market worldwide.

View the full story.

By John Liang
November 1, 2012 at 3:12 PM

Lockheed Martin has submitted its final proposal revision for the Medium-range Ballistic Missile Targets contract competition, the company announced today. According to a Lockheed statement:

The contract will provide Medium-range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) Targets to support Ballistic Missile Defense System element and system flight tests. Requirements include development and manufacturing of MRBMs, integrated logistics support to include inventory storage and maintenance, pre- and post-mission analysis, launch preparation and execution and engineering services.

The final proposal revision responds to amendments to the request for proposals made by the MDA following Lockheed Martin's submission of its proposal in June. The MDA anticipates contract award in 2012.

According to the original Federal Business Opportunities notice posted in January:

The core MRBM capability is a 2,000km target with a 600kg payload. MRBM requirements include development and manufacturing of MRBMs, integrated logistics support to include inventory storage and maintenance, pre and post mission analysis, launch preparation and execution, and engineering services. The requirement is for targets under a contract including cost-reimbursement and fixed priced contract line items. Modified Ballistic Re-entry Vehicles (MBRVs) and Associated Objects (AOs) will be government furnished and the prime contractor will be required to integrate onto their solution. The anticipated need is for 6 with options for additional targets. The targets will be air and ground launch capable.

Inside Missile Defense reported in March that the Pentagon's inspector general had launched an audit to determine whether officials testing U.S. defenses against ballistic missiles are using realistic targets that simulate the latest, most deadly versions of these high-tech weapons:

Alice Carey, assistant inspector general for readiness, operations and support, announced the audit in a Feb. 10 memo to senior defense officials. Inside the Pentagon obtained a copy of the memo, which states the IG will "evaluate whether the Ballistic Missile Defense System targets provides realistic operational conditions for identified threats and if the Target Program adapts to emerging threats." The memo also notes the IG would consider suggestions from management on additional or revised objectives.

DOD IG is performing the audit at the Missile Defense Agency in Huntsville, AL; U.S. Strategic Command in Omaha, NE; and the U.S. Army Garrison Ft. Greely, AK, according to the memo.

Missile Defense Agency spokeswoman Pamela Rogers declined to comment on whether the BMDS targets are realistic and whether the target effort has adapted to emerging threats.

"Since the audit is under way, the Missile Defense Agency will not provide a response to your questions at this time," Rogers said.

By John Liang
October 31, 2012 at 3:50 PM

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-CA) has more questions regarding White House assertions about the military response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya.

In an Oct. 29 letter to President Obama, McKeon writes:

There appears to be a discrepancy between your directive and the actions taken by the Department of Defense. As we are painfully aware, despite the fact that the military had resources in the area, the military did not deploy any assets to secure U.S. personnel in Benghazi during the hours the consulate and the annex were under attack. I find it implausible that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of U.S. Africa Command, and the Commander of U.S. European Command would have ignored a direct order from the Commander in Chief. Therefore, could you please clarify:

* To whom did you issue this first directive and how was this directive communicated to the military and other agencies – verbally or in writing?

* At any time on September 11, 2012, did you specifically direct the military to move available assets into Libya to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel in Benghazi? If so, which assets did you order to Libya?

* At any time on September 11, 2012, other than ISR assets, did you provide the authority for the military to take any and all necessary measures to secure U.S. personnel, including specifically the authority to enter Libyan airspace?

* Did you have any communication with the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or any Commanders of regional Combatant Commands regarding military support to U.S. personnel in Benghazi on September 11th? If so, could you please describe any recommendations provided to you regarding available military support and any orders you gave to them?

By Gabe Starosta
October 30, 2012 at 5:09 PM

The Defense Department spent slightly more than $21 billion in fiscal year 2012 on classified military intelligence programs, according to a brief news release issued this morning.

DOD said its FY-12 Military Intelligence Program funding totaled $21.5 billion. "The department determined that releasing this top line figure does not jeopardize any classified activities within the MIP," the statement adds.

The announcement provided no additional details on how those dollars were spent, citing national security concerns.

By John Liang
October 30, 2012 at 12:00 PM

The Army recently released its annual weapon systems handbook, which states:

The goal of our acquisition initiatives is to work with our industry and academic partners to more efficiently develop and deliver capabilities needed by the Soldier. A key aspect of this is an effort to identify and address inefficiencies discovered in the acquisition process.

A system-of-systems approach is vital to these ongoing efforts to transform business practices. The Army will continue to look at developing, managing, and acquiring technologies in the most efficient way possible, an approach which includes the need to understand the interdependencies among systems. We place an emphasis upon maturing the capability to synchronize programs and integrate schedules, deliveries, and other developments across the acquisition process.

As a result of these and other practices, the acquisition community remains acutely aware of its need to further the transformation of its business efforts. These initiatives help the Army transform as an institution and ensure that the best value possible is provided to the taxpayer and the Soldier -- who is at the very center of these efforts.

View the full document.

By Christopher J. Castelli
October 29, 2012 at 2:26 PM

With the federal government closed today due to Hurricane Sandy, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s scheduled speech tonight in downtown Washington has been postponed, according to a Defense Department statement issued last night. Panetta was scheduled to speak at a Center for a New American Security (CNAS) event at 6:45 p.m. at the Willard InterContinental Grand Ballroom.

Last Friday, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little offered curious reporters no details about the planned substance of the speech. Little said he was not aware of any major announcements in the speech, but said that could change over the weekend.

In a separate statement, CNAS said the event has been rescheduled for Nov. 20. The event had been billed simply as a conversation with Panetta, with an introduction by former DOD policy chief Michèle Flournoy, a member of the CNAS board of directors.

Despite the hurricane, the department said last night it would proceed this morning with the planned unveiling of the official Pentagon portrait of Panetta’s predecessor, Robert Gates.

As of 8 p.m. last night, there were roughly 1,500 National Guard forces on state active duty supporting the governors of New York, Massachusetts, Virginia, New Jersey, Delaware, Connecticut and Maryland. These forces were helping local first responders and FEMA with critical tasks such and assistance at evacuation shelters, route clearance, search and rescue and delivery of essential equipment and supplies, according to a DOD statement. “More than 61,100 National Guard members are available to assist civilian authorities in potentially affected states in support of relief efforts,” the statement adds. “Available National Guard resources include almost 140 rotary-winged aircraft to perform search and rescue, reconnaissance and personnel or cargo-carrying missions.”

By John Liang
October 29, 2012 at 12:00 PM

The Army's latest air and missile defense strategy defines the "networked mission command" concept as "a single, common air and missile defense command and control system operating via an open modular architecture integrated into Army mission command and Joint engagement architectures." The document further states:

This capability will reside at all AMD mission command nodes and will include common interfaces for sensors and weapons. It will provide AMD forces the ability to integrate air and missile defense engagement and force operations and present decision-makers at all levels with tools that help them manage the aerial fight.

Army Secretary John McHugh and Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno signed the strategy last month.

In related news, Inside the Army reports this morning that the document likely will do little to settle the debate on whether to favor the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 system over the soon-to-be-abandoned Medium Extended Air Defense System:

On one hand, the document describes the U.S. decision to abandon MEADS as a "complicating" factor in adapting Army capabilities to emerging threats. At the same time, it states that the program's planned 360-degree engagement capability could be approximated with Patriot hardware and new software.

"[R]ather than creating a new MEADS program, IBCS [the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System] will allow Patriot to integrate a new radar with the existing omni-directional launchers on the network, creating a 360-degree capability that also leverages non-organic Army and joint data," the document reads.

According to the Army's AMD strategy, service officials envision "initial fielding" of AIAMD, the service's key program for achieving a networked force of sensors and interceptors, in 2016, through the deployment of IBCS. By 2020, officials expect integration of Patriot and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system through the integration of their command-and-control systems -- IBCS for Patriot and the Command, Control, Battle Management, and Communications for THAAD.

In 2028, "complete" fielding of IBCS would lead to a "fully integrated and networked family of AMD systems that additionally integrates other Army capabilities (aviation, intelligence, fires) and joint and coalition contributions," the strategy states.

Patriot, conceived in the 1970s and upgraded several times since it was first fielded, remains a fixture in the new Army strategy. The document calls for "pre-planned product improvements" to be fielded by 2016 and the provision of 15 Patriot battalions through at least 2020.

The document includes no cost projections for new development work necessary to implement the strategy. However, the complexity of the work proposed -- particularly in the historically risky area of large-scale software projects -- suggests the price tag could rise to the tens of billions of dollars.

View the rest of the ITA story.

View the full "Air And Missile Defense Strategy".

By John Liang
October 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Oshkosh Corp. this morning released its earnings report for the last quarter of fiscal year 2012, reporting income from continuing operations of $77.6 million compared to $40.3 million during the same quarter last year.

On defense sales, the company said:

Defense segment sales decreased 18.6 percent to $953.7 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 compared with the prior year fourth quarter. The decrease was primarily due to expected lower shipments under the Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles and MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle programs, as well as lower aftermarket parts sales, offset in part by higher Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) unit sales.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, defense segment operating income decreased 12.6 percent to $62.0 million, or 6.5 percent of sales, compared to prior year fourth quarter operating income of $71.0 million, or 6.1 percent of sales. The decrease in operating income was largely due to lower sales volumes offset in part by a favorable year-end LIFO reserve adjustment and improved margins under the FMTV contract. The defense segment also benefited in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 from favorable cost estimate changes upon the definitization of contracts.

View Oshkosh's full statement, as well as the quarterly statements of other defense contractors.

By Stephanie Bergman
October 25, 2012 at 6:23 PM

The Defense Department and the defense industry as a whole will soon be facing a shortage of qualified cybersecurity and intelligence workers, according to a report released today by the National Academy of Sciences.

The report notes the long training time needed for science, technology, engineering and mathematics workers and warns that shortages today, combined with the aging of the current STEM workforce and needs in areas like cybersecurity and intelligence, are only going to grow worse.

One way to mitigate those shortages, the report states, would be to offer higher pay to convince students to enter STEM fields in general and the defense sector in particular. The report also calls on DOD to replicate the culture of Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works division, which focuses on interesting and complex problems and endorses out-of-the-box problem solving.

The report is the final version of a study published in interim form in June. The recommendations are largely the same, but the final version discusses more issues in greater depth.

The report's authors discuss the difficulty of predicting exactly which types of STEM workers DOD will need in the future given the rapidly changing nature of technology.

The report also notes that the DOD workforce as a whole is expected to shrink, and the defense industry is reducing its numbers as well. Given these trends, the report says, the STEM worker shortage may be less severe than expected, except in fields like cybersecurity.