(Editor's note: This story has been updated to include a statement from Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA).)
The House Rules Committee voted 9-4 to advance the annual defense authorization bill, approving around 300 amendments for debate, with floor consideration slated for later today.
The bill, known as the "Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026," began with more than 1,000 proposed amendments.
Democratic lawmakers argued that a defense bill free of divisive “culture war” amendments would garner broad bipartisan support, such as when the measure first passed out of the House Armed Services Committee.
The bill, however, includes amendments to block gender-affirming medical care, which is set to cost it the support of some Democrats, including Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, who listed several objections to the actions of the Trump administration including its use of the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement, the firings of senior military leaders, eliminating inspectors general, and cutting the jobs of cyber experts via downsizing at the Pentagon.
“I will be voting no on the passage of the rule for the FY26 NDAA and standing in strong opposition to its failure to provide meaningful debate on core policy disagreements with the Trump administration," he said. "Furthermore, there are a number of problematic amendments included in the rule that focus on divisive topics rather than strengthening our national security. Should these amendments be adopted, I will vote against final passage of the bill."
Additionally, the bill does not contain any standalone amendments proposed by Democrats.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL) said the bill’s initial show of bipartisan support out of committee can be attributed to its focus on national security.
“We keep the focus on the warfighter and making sure we give them what they need to be successful and safe,” he said. “That is our focus. It always has been. We still have our robust debates around some small measure of issues but generally the focus is where it should be and that is our national security.”
Smith predicted the bill, if it were allowed to proceed to the floor largely free of divisive amendments, could easily win 360 or 370 votes. He noted, however, that the “principal risk” facing the measure would be culture war debates.
Along with other measures that will be debated, the bill contains a bipartisan amendment to repeal the 1991 and 2002 laws authorizing the use of military force, which has been unsuccessful in previous years.
The bill also includes an amendment authored by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) that would bar U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
The House Armed Services Committee has set up a floor amendment tracker to follow the debate in real time.
Watch Inside Defense for further coverage.