The Insider

By John Liang
November 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM

The Defense Department accounts for a large chunk of the government's purchasing, and most of those buys are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation. So it's handy that the Congressional Research Service this month completed a primer on the FAR:

In particular, Members, committees, and staff may find themselves (1) considering or drafting legislation that would amend the FAR to save money, promote transparency, or further other public policies; (2) conducting oversight of executive agencies' performance in procuring goods and services; and (3) responding to questions from constituents regarding executive branch procurement activities. In addition, certain commentators have recently suggested that some or all FAR provisions should be withdrawn.

The FAR is a regulation, codified in Parts 1 through 53 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which generally governs acquisitions of goods and services by executive branch agencies. It addresses various aspects of the acquisition process, from acquisition planning to contract formation, to contract management. Depending upon the topic, the FAR may provide contracting officers with (1) the government’s basic policy (e.g., small businesses are to be given the “maximum practicable opportunity” to participate in acquisitions); (2) any requirements agencies must meet (e.g., obtain full and open competition through the use of competitive procedures); (3) any exceptions to the requirements (e.g., when and how agencies may waive a contractor's exclusion); and (4) any required or optional clauses to be included, or incorporated by reference, in the solicitation or contract (e.g., termination for convenience). The FAR also articulates the guiding principles for the federal acquisition system, which include satisfying the customer in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness of the delivered goods and services; minimizing operating costs; conducting business with integrity, fairness, and openness; and fulfilling public policy objectives. In addition, the FAR identifies members and roles of the "acquisition team."

The FAR is the result of a 1979 statute directing the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to "issue polic[ies] … for the purpose of promoting the development and implementation of [a] uniform procurement system." Partly in response to this directive, the FAR was issued in 1983, and took effect in 1984. It has been revised frequently since then, in response to legislation, executive orders, litigation, and policy considerations. These revisions are generally made by the Administrator of General Services, the Secretary of Defense, and the Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space, acting on behalf of the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council. However, the Administrator of OFPP also has the authority to amend the FAR in certain circumstances. FAR amendments generally apply only to contracts awarded after the effective date of the amendment.

While the FAR contains the principal rules of the federal acquisition system, it is not the only authority governing acquisitions of goods and services by executive branch agencies. Statutes, agency FAR supplements, other agency regulations, and guidance documents may also apply. In some cases, these sources cover topics not covered in the FAR, and sometimes the FAR addresses topics not expressly addressed in statute or elsewhere. In addition, it is the contract (not the FAR) that binds the contractor, although judicial and other tribunals may read terms required by the FAR into contracts which lack them.

Agencies subject to the FAR may deviate from it in certain circumstances, and agencies or transactions not subject to the FAR may be subject to similar requirements under other authority.

View the full CRS report -- originally obtained by Secrecy News.

By John Liang
November 27, 2012 at 8:27 PM

The Pentagon recently issued an updated doctrine document on the use of geospatial intelligence in joint operations.

The Oct. 31 publication "provides doctrine for cross-functional geospatial intelligence (GEOINT) support to joint operations. It discusses roles, GEOINT operational processes, planning, coordination, production, dissemination, existing architectures, and assessment of GEOINT."

The changes to the previous doctrine document published in 2007 include:

* Modifies the construct of geospatial intelligence (GEOINT), which may consist of imagery, imagery intelligence, and geospatial information.

* Adds Safety of Navigation reference of Global Positioning System (GPS) as the primary source of positioning, navigation, and timing information and describes the significance GPS plays in GEOINT information.

* Deletes reference to the Defense Intelligence Operations Coordination Center (DIOCC). DIOCC disestablishment occurred on 1 October 2011.

* Updates the support activities of US Strategic Command.

* Adds US Transportation Command's Unified Command Plan (UCP) responsibility for synchronizing planning for global distribution operations.

* Revises the US Transportation Command's subordinate command to include the Joint Enabling Capabilities Command.

* Updates US Special Operations Command's responsibilities based on UCP change.

* Provides an expanded summary of US Air Force support to GEOINT.

* Modifies wording of the US Coast Guard's surveillance mission.

* Includes features associated with cyberspace.

* Modifies phases of imagery exploitation.

* Replaces current remote replication services with former remote GEOINT services.

* Modifies GEOINT targeting support.

* Clarifies real-time meteorological and oceanographic (METOC) support and data.

* Updates Navy METOC center web pages and links.

View the full document.

By John Liang
November 27, 2012 at 3:48 PM

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress yesterday of a proposed $300 million Foreign Military Sale to Saudi Arabia "to provide funds for blanket order requisitions under the Cooperative Logistics Supply Support Arrangement, for spare parts in support of M1A2 Abrams Tanks, M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles, equipment, support vehicles and other related logistics support."

Further, according to the DSCA statement:

This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been, and continues to be, an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.

This proposed sale will allow the Royal Saudi Land Forces Ordnance Corps to continue to purchase needed repair parts to maintain their fleet of M1A2S Abrams Tanks, M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, and High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs), construction equipment, and support vehicles and equipment.

The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

There are no prime contractors involved with this sale. There are no known offset agreements in connection with this potential sale.

Implementation of this proposed sale will not require the assignment of any additional U.S. Government or contractor representatives to Saudi Arabia.

There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

By John Liang
November 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM

The Congressional Research Service recently issued an updated report on military contacts between the United States and China.

The Oct. 25 report -- originally obtained by Secrecy News and posted on the OpenCRS website -- "discusses policy issues regarding military-to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People's Republic of China (PRC) and provides a record of major contacts and crises since 1993." Further:

Issues for Congress include whether the Obama Administration has complied with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursued contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L. 106-65). Skeptics and proponents of military exchanges with the PRC have debated whether the contacts have achieved results in U.S. objectives and whether the contacts have contributed to the PLA's warfighting capabilities that might harm U.S. security interests. Some have argued about whether the value that U.S. officials place on the contacts overly extends leverage to the PLA. Some believe talks can serve U.S. interests that include conflict avoidance/crisis management; military-civilian coordination; transparency and reciprocity; tension reduction over Taiwan; weapons nonproliferation; nuclear/missile/space/cyber talks; counterterrorism; and POW/MIA accounting.

Additionally . . .

Policymakers could review the approach to mil-to-mil contacts, given concerns about crises. U.S. officials have faced challenges in cooperation from the PLA. The PLA has tried to use its suspensions of exchanges while blaming U.S. "obstacles" (including arms sales to Taiwan, legal restrictions on contacts, and the Pentagon’s reports to Congress on the PLA). The PRC's harassment of U.S. surveillance ships (in 2009) and increasing assertiveness in maritime areas have shown the limits to mil-to-mil talks and PLA restraint. Still, at the Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED) in July 2009, President Obama called for military contacts to diminish disputes with China. The U.S. military seeks to expand cooperation with the PLA. The NDAA for FY2010 (P.L. 111-84) amended P.L. 106-65 for the annual report on PRC military power to expand the focus to security developments involving the PRC, add cooperative elements, and fold in another report on mil-to-mil contacts. However, the Administration was late in submitting this report in 2010, 2011, and 2012. Enacted as P.L. 112-81 on December 31, 2011, the FY2012 NDAA required reporting on cyber threats but did not require a change back to the original title, while adding a requirement for a report from the Defense Secretary before any waiver of a ban on defense procurement from PLA companies. H.R. 4310 and S. 3254, NDAA for FY2013, would strengthen the annual reporting on military and security challenges and mil-to-mil engagement.

View the full report.

By John Liang
November 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM
The Missile Defense Agency yesterday held a formal change-of-command ceremony to mark Navy Vice Adm. James Syring's succession of Army Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly as the organization's ninth director.

O'Reilly had served as head of MDA since November 2008.

Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall presided over the ceremony held at MDA's headquarters at Ft. Belvoir, VA, according to an agency statement.

By John Liang
November 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM

Raytheon and Lockheed Martin's Javelin Joint Venture effort could be getting more business.

In a pair of statements issued yesterday afternoon, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced it had notified Congress of potential sales of Javelin anti-tank guided missiles to Oman and Indonesia that could be worth a cumulative $146 million.

If the sales go through, Oman would get 400 Javelins along with associated equipment worth $96 million and Indonesia would get 180 Javelins and supporting equipment worth $60 million, according to DSCA.

On the proposed sale to Oman, DSCA states:

This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been, and continues to be, an important force for political and economic progress in the Middle East.

The proposed sale of the JAVELIN Anti-Tank Weapon System will improve Oman's capability to meet current and future threats and provide greater security for its critical oil and natural gas infrastructure. Oman will use the enhanced capability to strengthen its homeland defense. Oman will have no difficulty absorbing these missiles into its armed forces.

As for Indonesia:

The proposed sale provides Indonesia with assets vital to protect its sovereign territory and deter potential threats. The acquisition of the Javelin system is part of the Indonesia Army’s overall military modernization program. The proposed sale will foster continued cooperation between the U.S. and Indonesia, making Indonesia a more valuable regional partner in an important area of the world.

By John Liang
November 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM

The Pentagon acquisition office recently released its updated "Coalition Warfare Management Plan" for fiscal years 2013-2014.

Coalition Warfare Program projects "enable Project Teams to move a technology into the next stage of development or prepare for transition to operational forces," the program's website states. Further:

These projects may also form the basis for future cooperation with our international partners.  CWP pursues projects that enhance and increase U.S. and coalition defense capabilities in support of technological or political objectives. Funded projects accelerate the delivery of high-quality solutions to warfighter problems, improve U.S. interoperability with its coalition partners, and strengthen global partnerships. CWP projects support DoD acquisition by:

*    Helping program offices convert U.S.-only projects into coalition solutions for the U.S. warfighter

*    Influencing coalition interoperability in major programs that will have far-reaching use by U.S. forces

*    Addressing requirements of combined operations early in a program’s development cycle to avert risks to joint/coalition operations and avoid costs associated with adding requirements later in the acquisition process

*    Enabling U.S. DoD access to leading-edge global technology

*    Providing significant cost savings to the DoD while maintaining a strong research and development base

As a research and development funding source in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, CWP strives to bridge the gap between the Combatant Commanders/operational components of the Services and the development and acquisition organizations.  CWP funding incentivizes the R&D community to build and sustain solutions to COCOM and operational component capability gaps.

View the FY-13/14 Coalition Warfare Management Plan.

By Dan Dupont
November 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM

GAO has taken up the issue of Air Force and Navy plans to extend the service life of mainstay fighters in a new report, noting that the two plan to spend almost $5 billion to keep 300 F-16s and 150 F/A-18s around a lot longer.

Here's some of what GAO auditors found:

The Air Force’s and Navy’s cost estimates to upgrade and extend the service life of selected fighter aircraft exhibit some characteristics of a high-quality cost estimate but do not reflect all potential costs. The estimates were well-documented since they identified data sources and methodologies; accurate since they accounted for inflation and were checked for errors; and mostly comprehensive since they included the work planned and identified key assumptions. However, the estimates were not fully credible in part because they did not assess the extent to which the total costs could change if additional work is done or more aircraft are included in the programs.

And what they suggest:

GAO recommends that the Air Force and Navy follow all best practices to enhance the credibility of the cost estimates for the F-16 and F/A-18 upgrades and life extensions including an assessment of the potential range of costs and seeking independent cost estimates. DOD agreed with all four recommendations.

By Christopher J. Castelli
November 15, 2012 at 5:35 PM

U.S. and NATO forces have made little progress eliminating the safe havens that violent extremists have maintained in Pakistan, said Gen. Joseph Dunford, President Obama's nominee to be the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

The problem needs to be addressed over time, Dunford said this morning during questioning at his confirmation hearing.

Dunford, the Marine Corps assistant commandant, said corruption is the most significant strategic challenge in Afghanistan. Asked if U.S. and NATO forces are winning the war in Afghanistan, Dunford said progress is being made.

But Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said if the Obama administration decides to draw down troop levels below 68,000, the war may not be worth continuing. "If we can't accomplish the mission, I'm not sure why we should stay," McCain said.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), the chairman of the committee, and McCain voiced support for Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, whose nomination to lead U.S. European Command is on hold.

Also during the hearing, Dunford praised section 841 of the fiscal year 2012 Defense Authorization Act, which gave U.S. Central Command new authorities to avoid contracting with the enemy.

By Dan Dupont
November 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and his counterpart from Thailand, Sukumpol Suwanatat, today issued a new "joint vision statement" on defense ties between the two countries:

For more than 50 years, the Thai-U.S. defense alliance has promoted regional stability by fostering cooperation in areas that enable both nations to address shared security concerns effectively. Both nations reaffirmed this relationship when Thailand became a Major Non-NATO Ally of the United States in 2004. Today, the alliance is a true 21st century partnership that addresses a range of challenges, including responding to natural and manmade disasters, confronting transnational threats, contributing to global peacekeeping, and addressing maritime security issues. The Thai-U.S. defense alliance supports Thailand’s position as a regional leader – including within the Association of South East Asia Nations (ASEAN) and other regional bodies – and the United States’ enduring presence in the Asia-Pacific. Continuous policy consultation and coordination on regional and global security affairs lays the foundation for our defense activities.

As the Thai-U.S. defense alliance is calibrated to address 21st- century challenges, defense cooperation is to focus on the following four areas: 1) Partnership for Regional Security in Southeast Asia; 2) Supporting Stability in the Asia-Pacific Region and Beyond; 3) Bilateral and Multilateral Interoperability and Readiness; and 4) Relationship Building, Coordination, and Collaboration at All Levels.

For the full statement, click here.

By Dan Dupont
November 14, 2012 at 3:21 PM

The United States and Australia have stepped up their space ties, the Defense Department announced today, agreeing to "advance the bi-lateral long-term international partnership on space situational awareness by placing two key U.S. space systems in Australia."

The two militaries have agreed that Australia will operate a U.S. Air Force C-band ground-based radar system in Australia. The system will provide a critical dedicated sensor for the U.S. Space Surveillance Network (SSN), which is the principal system that the U.S. and its partners rely on to detect, track, and identify objects in space.

The U.S. and Australia have also decided to work towards the establishment of the Space Surveillance Telescope (SST) on Australian soil. The SST is a state of the art optical telescope designed and built by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) that provides deep space surveillance.

The C-Band radar will be operated from the Harold E. Holt Naval Communications Station at North West Cape in Western Australia; the Australians are in the process of selecting a site for the SST. The United States and Australia will share relocation and operational costs for the systems. The C-Band radar will be delivered in 2014. Together, these complimentary platforms will provide highly accurate tracking and identification of objects in space, such as satellites and debris, in order to improve overall spaceflight safety. Data from these platforms will also improve the operational perspective for senior leaders to select and execute appropriate courses of action in response to space events and scenarios.

In addition, the U.S. and Australia are in discussions on the establishment of a Combined Communications Gateway in Western Australia. The Gateway would provide both U.S. and Australia operators access to Wideband Global Satellite communications satellites currently on orbit.

The actions taken today are the result of close collaboration from both nations on “New Frontiers” projects -- including space and cyberspace -- during the last two AUSMIN sessions. At the Melbourne AUSMIN 2010 conference, leaders signed the Space Situational Awareness Partnership. At the San Francisco AUSMIN 2011, leaders discussed the goal of placing U.S. space systems in Australia and signed a landmark agreement on cyberspace.

The U.S. National Security Space Strategy emphasizes that shared awareness of spaceflight activity must improve in order to foster global spaceflight safety and help prevent mishaps, misperceptions, and mistrust. Locating the C-Band radar and the SST telescope in Australia demonstrates progress towards these goals and the benefits of the re-balance towards the Asia-Pacific across domains.

Additional information on the collaboration efforts are in the full press release.

By Thomas Duffy
November 13, 2012 at 10:16 PM

During a briefing today on the Defense Department's newest acquisition reform plan, called Better Buying Power 2.0, the Pentagon's top acquisition official addressed the gloomy prospects of an additional $500 billion in cuts via the sequestration trigger.

Frank Kendall, the under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, said the department has been trying to make the acquisition workforce more cost conscious and yet sequestration would impose a very inefficient way to take money out of the defense budget.

He added:

I mean, time is money, particularly in development, and I think we're taking -- I mentioned earlier -- too long to get things through development nowadays. A variety of reasons for that, but one of the things that does that is, people tend to want to hang on to all their programs when cuts come in, so basically you reduce the level of everything and you stretch it out. That can be a very inefficient thing. You sometimes need to make harder choices and decide what not to do.

We've canceled quite a few programs from the last few years, and frankly I don't see a lot of potential for additional steps to do that to take money out of the budget. So it's going to be -- it's -- you know, we will work our way through whatever number we get. We did a very in-depth exercise to both build a strategy and then build a budget last year, which we think is all very sound. If we have additional cuts which are too significant, then we're going to have to go back and reconsider all that and fundamentally, reconsider the capabilities we can provide to the nation.

There's a level at which you just -- you know, you've stretched things out to the point where you just can't deliver what's needed. You know, there is a requirement to equip our forces with a certain number of items when the forces are a certain size and replace those items over a certain period of time. You know, that's kind of -- and the right way to formulate a budget is to have a balance between the force structure and the other things that contribute to sustaining and equipping that force structure.

And if we get too out of balance, we'll end up with a hollow force. It could be hollow the way it was during the Cold War. I experienced this in Germany as an Army officer. We had no parts. We had no readiness. We were hollow from the point of view of readiness. You can be hollow from a point of view of training. You can be hollow from the point of view of modernization, if your equipment's obsolete relative to potential opponents. So we want to avoid all of those things, and it requires us staying in balance.

By Dan Dupont
November 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM

As the Pentagon fights a Senate provision that would cut back Navy alternative fuels efforts, a business group has compiled a report claiming the military could generate major economic activity and jobs -- $10 billion or more of the former and 14,000 of the latter, to be specific:

The military’s biofuels initiatives could do more than just power jet planes, aircraft carriers and armored vehicles – they could also help power the economy, according to a new report from Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2).

The E2 report will be unveiled during a live, phone-based news conference at 11 a.m. EST Wednesday (Nov. 14, 2012), on the heels of Veteran’s Day.

Environmental Entrepeneurs bills itself as "a national community of business leaders who promote sound environmental policy that builds economic prosperity."

Among the speakers at Wednesday's event will be retired Vice Adm. Dennis McGinn, president of the American Council on Renewable Energy.

More from the group's statement:

Congress is about to take up the National Defense Authorization Act, which in current versions would prohibit the DoD from moving forward with its plans and desires to increase its use of biofuels. Citing national security concerns, the Navy and Air Force want to replace 50 percent of their fuel supplies with non-petroleum biofuels by 2020.

Just as military innovation and leadership transformed our nation’s economy in sectors ranging from aviation to communication to computers, the military’s biofuels expansion could provide a major boost to the economy and job creation, and help transform the nation’s energy, airline and agriculture industries.

By Thomas Duffy
November 12, 2012 at 8:40 PM

Last week the Defense Department issued an instruction that puts in place a policy to protect the department's warfighting mission capabilities from vulnerabilities in a system's design -- or sabotage or subversion.

The Nov. 5 instruction, signed by DOD acquisition chief Frank Kendall and Chief Information Officer Teri Takai, succinctly states its purpose:

Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities to minimize the risk that DoD’s warfighting mission capability will be impaired due to vulnerabilities in system design or sabotage or subversion of a system’s mission critical functions or critical components, as defined in this Instruction, by foreign intelligence, terrorists, or other hostile elements.

The new policy draws upon DOD's "Trusted Systems and Networks" strategy, which uses robust systems engineering, supply chain risk management, intelligence, counterintelligence and information assurance, among other tactics, to control risks that threaten military systems.

By John Liang
November 9, 2012 at 6:23 PM

A State Department advisory group that focuses on defense trade issues plans to hold a meeting late this month, according to a notice published in this morning's Federal Register:

The Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG) will meet in open session from 1:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 28, 2012, in the East Auditorium, U.S. Department of State, Harry S. Truman Building, Washington, DC. Entry and registration will begin at 12:00 p.m. Please use the building entrance located at 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, between C & D Streets.

The membership of this advisory committee consists of private sector defense trade representatives, appointed by the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, who advise the Department on policies, regulations, and technical issues affecting defense trade. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss current defense trade issues and topics for further study. Specific agenda topics will be posted on the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls' Web site, at www.pmddtc.state.gov approximately 10 days prior to the meeting.

Members of the public may attend this open session and will be permitted to participate in the discussion in accordance with the Chair's instructions. Members of the public may, if they wish, submit a brief statement to the committee in writing.

Click here to view the full notice.